Wikipedia:Pikëpamje neutrale: Dallime mes rishikimesh

Content deleted Content added
Rreshti 138:
Hence, on the one hand, Wikipedia does not officially take a stand even on such obvious issues, but on the other, it will not look as though we (the authors of Wikipedia) had accorded equal credibility to morally repugnant views. Given that the authors of Wikipedia represent a rough cross-section of the educated public, our readers can expect us to have a similar cross-section of opinion about extremism: most of us abhor it.
 
=== Pikëpamje shqiptro-centrike===
=== Americo-centric point of view ===
 
''Wikipedia shqiptare duket se ka një pikëpamje shqiptaro-centrike. Nuk është kjo kundër pikëpamjes neutrale?''
''Wikipedia seems to have an Americo-centric point of view. Isn't this contrary to the neutral point of view?''
 
Po, sigurisht që është, dhe askush në Wikipedia nuk e mbron. Prezenca e artikujve të shkruar nga një pikëpamje thjesht shqiptare ështe vetëm një reflektim i faktit që ka shumë shqiptarë që marrin pjesë në projekt. Ky ështe problem që mund të korigjohet nga bashkëpunim aktiv me joshqiptarë.
Yes, it certainly is, and it has no defenders on Wikipedia. The presence of articles written from an exclusively United States point of view is merely a reflection of the fact that there are many Americans working on the project, which in turn is merely a reflection of the fact that so many Americans are online and working on the English project.
 
Megjithatë ky nuk është vetëm problem i Wikipedias shqiptare. Enciklopedia angleze mund të shprehë pikëpamje më amerikane apo ajo franceze pikëpamje më franceze etj..
This is an ongoing problem that can be corrected by active collaboration from people outside of the U.S., of whom there are many.
 
This is not only a problem in English. The French Wikipedia may reflect a Continental French bias, the Japanese Wikipedia may suffer from Japanese bias, and so on.
 
=== Lack of neutrality as an excuse to delete ===