[Redaktim i kontrolluar][Redaktim i kontrolluar]
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Rreshti 78:
'tejlidhjeve që korruptojnë vlerat tradicionale' në [[Taivan]].<ref>[http://sex.ncu.edu.tw/animal-love/news/2004Jan-Jun/Wang.pdf The prosecution of Taiwan sexuality researcher and activist Josephine Ho]</ref>
 
In 2000 [[British Telecom]]-i suedpaditi [[Prodigy (ISP)|Prodigy]]-në, claimingme thatpretendimin se Prodigy-ja infringedkish itsshkelur patentpatentën e saj ({{US patent|4873662}}) onmbi webtejlidhje hyperlinksweb. After [[litigation]], a [[court]] found for Prodigy, ruling that [[British Telecom]]'s patent did not cover web hyperlinks.<ref>[[CNET]] News.com, [http://news.com.com/2100-1033-955001.html Hyperlink patent case fails to click]. August 23, 2002.</ref>
 
In [[United States]] [[jurisprudence]], there is a distinction between the mere act of linking to someone else's website, and linking to content that is illegal or [[copyright infringement|infringing]].<ref>[http://www.cybertelecom.org/ip/links.htm Cybertelecom:: Legal to Link?]{{dead link|date=September 2010}}</ref> Several courts have found that merely linking to someone else's website is not copyright or trademark infringement, regardless of how much someone else might object.<ref>Ford Motor Company v. 2600 Enterprises, 177 F.Supp.2d 611 (EDMi December 20, 2001)</ref><ref>American Civil Liberties Union v. Miller, 977 F.Supp. 1228 (ND Ga. 1997)</ref><ref>Ticketmaster Corp. v. Tickets.Com, Inc., No. 99-07654 (CD Calif. March 27, 2000)</ref> Linking to illegal or infringing content can be sufficiently problematic to give rise to legal liability.<ref>[http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/cjoyce/copyright/release10/IntRes.html Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry, Inc.], 75 FSupp2d 1290 (D Utah 1999)</ref><ref>Universal City Studios Inc v Reimerdes, 111 FSupp2d 294 (DCNY 2000)</ref><ref>[http://www.linksandlaw.com/decision-161-comcast-illinoi-hightech-elec.pdf Comcast of Illinois X LLC v. Hightech Elec. Inc.], District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Decision of July 28, 2004, 03 C 3231</ref><ref>WebTVWire.com, [http://www.webtvwire.com/linking-to-infringing-content-is-probably-illegal-in-the-us/ Linking to Infringing Video is probably Illegal in the US]. December 10, 2006.</ref><ref>Compare [http://www.linksandlaw.com/decision-163-perfect-10-pictures-google.pdf Perfect 10 v. Google], Decision of February 21, 2006, Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (CD Cal. 2/21/06), CRI 2006, 76–88 No liability for thumbnail links to infringing content</ref> For a summary of the current status of US copyright law as to hyperlinking, see [[Copyright aspects of hyperlinking and framing#State of US law after Arriba Soft and Perfect 10|this discussion]].