Filmi dokumentar: Dallime mes rishikimesh

[redaktim i pashqyrtuar][redaktim i pashqyrtuar]
Content deleted Content added
v Reverted to revision 1332017 by Addbot on 2013-04-04T18:42:23Z
v deadlink fix: content removed from google cache, found on web archive
Rreshti 108:
}}</ref> However, directorial manipulation of documentary subjects has been noted since the work of Flaherty, and may be endemic to the form due to problematic ontological foundations.
 
Although the increasing popularity of the documentary genre, and the advent of [[DVD]]s, has made documentaries financially more viable, funding for documentary film production remains elusive. Within the past decade the largest exhibition opportunities have emerged from within the broadcast market, making filmmakers beholden to the tastes and influences of the broadcasters who have become their largest funding source.<ref>[http://72web.14archive.209.104org/search?q=cache:Uzn48Iw0L2sJweb/20070519040840/http://www.indiewire.com/ots/fes_01Sund_010208_Docs.html+theatrical+distribution+documentary&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us indiewire.com], "Festivals: Post-Sundance 2001; Docs Still Face Financing and Distribution Challenges". February 8, 2001. {{dead link|date=November 2010}}</ref>
 
Modern documentaries have some overlap with television forms, with the development of "''[[reality television]]''" that occasionally verges on the documentary but more often veers to the fictional or staged. The ''making-of'' documentary shows how a [[Film|movie]] or a [[video game|computer game]] was produced. Usually made for promotional purposes, it is closer to an advertisement than a classic documentary.