Wikipedia:Vërtetueshmëria: Dallime mes rishikimesh

Content deleted Content added
Faqe e re: {{politikë zyrtare}} Në Wikipedia, '''verifikueshmëria''' do të thotë se secili që përdorë enciklopedinë mund të kontrollojë nëse informacioni vjen nga #Çfarë llogarit...
 
Rreshti 4:
paraqit atë që burimet e ndryshme thonë, jepni secilës anë [[Wikipedia:Pikëpamje neutrale#Peshë e duhur dhe jo e duhur|peshën e saj të duhur]], dhe mbani [[Wikipedia:Pikëpamje neutrale|pikëpamje asnjanëse]].
==Përgjegjësia për dëshminë e citateve==
{{Përkthe}}
{{anchor|Burden|Burden of evidence}}All content must be verifiable. The '''burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material''', and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.<ref>Once an editor has provided any source that he or she believes, in good faith, to be sufficient, then any editor who later removes the material has an obligation to articulate specific problems that would justify its exclusion from Wikipedia (e.g., [[WP:DUE|undue emphasis]] on a minor point, unencyclopedic content, etc.). All editors are then expected to help achieve [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]], and any problems with the text or sourcing should be fixed before the material is added back.</ref>
 
{{anchor|Unsourced}}Attribute all quotations and any material '''challenged or likely to be challenged''' to a reliable, published source using an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations|inline citation]]. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article. Cite the source clearly and precisely (specifying page, section, or such divisions as may be appropriate). See [[WP:Citing sources|Citing sources]] for details of how to do this.
 
{{anchor|Challenge}}Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. Whether and how quickly material should be initially removed for not having a reliable source depends on the material and the overall state of the article. In some cases, editors may object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references; consider adding a [[Wikipedia:Citation needed|citation needed]] tag as an interim step.<ref>It may be that the article contains so few citations that it is impractical to add specific [[Wikipedia:Citation needed|citation needed]] tags, in which case consider tagging a section with {{tl|unreferencedsection}}, or the article with {{tl|refimprove}} or {{tl|unreferenced}}. In the case of a disputed category or on a disambiguation page, consider asking for a citation on the talk page.</ref> When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that there may not be a published reliable source for the content, and therefore it may not be verifiable.<ref>When tagging or removing such material, please keep in mind that such edits can be easily misunderstood. Some editors object to others making chronic, frequent, and large-scale deletions of unsourced information, especially if unaccompanied by other efforts to improve the material. Do not concentrate only on material of a particular POV, as that may result in accusations that you are in violation of [[WP:NPOV]]. Also check to see whether the material is sourced to a citation elsewhere on the page. For all of these reasons, it is advisable to communicate clearly that you have a considered reason to believe that the material in question cannot be verified.</ref> If you think the material is verifiable, [[WP:PRESERVE|you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself]] before considering whether to remove or tag it.
 
Do ''not'' leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of [[WP:BLP|living people]] or existing groups, and do not move it to the talk page. You should also be aware of how the [[Wikipedia:BLP#Legal_persons_and_groups|BLP policy applies to groups]].<ref name="Wales_2006-05_Wikimedia_wikien-l">[[Jimmy Wales|Wales, Jimmy]]. [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046440.html "Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"], WikiEN-l, May 16, 2006: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons."</ref>
 
==Burimet e besueshme==
===Çfarë llogaritet burim i besueshëm===