Wikipedia:Vërtetueshmëria: Dallime mes rishikimesh
Content deleted Content added
Liridon (diskuto | kontribute) |
Liridon (diskuto | kontribute) |
||
Rreshti 16:
===Çfarë llogaritet burim i besueshëm===
{{detaje|Wikipedia:Identifikimi i burimeve të besueshme|identifikimit të burimeve}}
{{Përkthe}}
The word "source" in Wikipedia has three meanings:
* The type of the work (some examples include a document, an article, or a book)
* The creator of the work (for example, the writer)
* The publisher of the work (for example, Oxford University Press)
All three can affect reliability.
Base articles on reliable, [[Wikipedia:Third-party sources|third-party]], published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been '''published''', the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form".<ref>This includes material such as documents in publicly accessible archives, inscriptions on monuments, gravestones, etc., that are available for anyone to see.</ref> '''Unpublished''' materials are not considered reliable. Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are appropriate to the claims made. The appropriateness of any source depends on the context. The best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source. Be especially careful when sourcing content related to [[WP:BLP|living people]] or [[WP:MEDRS|medicine]].
If available, academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources, such as in history, medicine, and science.
Editors may also use material from reliable non-academic sources, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include:
* University-level textbooks
* Books published by respected publishing houses
* Magazines
* Journals
* Mainstream newspapers
Editors may also use electronic media, subject to the same criteria. See details in ''[[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]] and [[Wikipedia:Search engine test]]''.
===Blogjet e gazetave dhe revistave===
{{policy shortcut|WP:NEWSBLOG}}
Several newspapers, magazines, and other news organizations host [[WP:PRIMARY|columns]] on their web sites that they call [[blog]]s. These may be acceptable sources if the writers are professionals, but use them with caution because the blog may not be subject to the news organization's normal fact-checking process.<ref name="EXCEPTIONAL">Please do note that any exceptional claim would require [[#Exceptional claims require exceptional sources|exceptional sources]]</ref> If a news organization publishes an [[WP:PRIMARY|opinion piece]] in a blog, attribute the statement to the writer (e.g. "Jane Smith wrote..."). Never use blog posts that are left by readers as sources. For personal or group blogs that are ''not'' reliable sources, see [[#Self-published sources|Self-published sources]] below.
===Reliable sources noticeboard and WP:IRS===
{{see|Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard|Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources}}
To discuss the reliability of a specific source for a particular statement, consult the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard|reliable sources noticeboard]], which seeks to apply this policy to particular cases. For a guideline discussing the reliability of particular ''types'' of sources, see [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]] (WP:IRS). In the case of inconsistency between this policy and the [[WP:IRS]] guideline, or any other guideline related to sourcing, this policy has priority.
==Burimet që zakonisht nuk janë të besueshme==
| |||