Wikipedia:Vërtetueshmëria: Dallime mes rishikimesh
Content deleted Content added
Liridon (diskuto | kontribute) |
Liridon (diskuto | kontribute) |
||
Rreshti 103:
In articles, the original text is usually included with the translated text when translated by Wikipedians, and the translating editor is usually not cited. When quoting any material, whether in English or in some other language, be careful not to [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|violate copyright]]; see the [[Wikipedia:Fair use#Text|fair-use guideline]].
==Probleme të tjera==
{{Përkthe}}
===Verifikueshmëria nuk garanton përfshirjen===
{{See also|WP:UNDUE|WP:PAGEDECIDE}}
{{shortcut|WP:ONUS}}
While information must be verifiable in order to be included in an article, this does not mean that all verifiable information must be included in an article. [[WP:Consensus|Consensus]] may determine that certain information does not improve an article, and that it should be omitted or [[WP:PRESERVE|presented instead in a different article]]. The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.
===Etiketimi i një fjalie, seksioni, ose artikulli===
{{detaje|Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles}}
If you want to request a source for an unsourced statement, you can tag a sentence with the {{tl|citation needed}} template by writing {{tl|cn}} or {{tl|fact}}. There are other templates [[Wikipedia:Template_messages/Cleanup#Verifiability_and_sources|here]] for tagging sections or entire articles. You can also leave a note on the [[Help:Talk page|talk page]] asking for a source, or move the material to the talk page and ask for a source there. To request verification that a reference supports the text, tag it with {{tl|verification needed}}. Material that fails verification may be tagged with {{tl|failed verification}} or removed. When using templates to tag material, it is helpful to other editors if you explain your rationale in the template, edit summary, or on the talk page.
Take special care with material about [[WP:BLP|living people]]. Contentious material about living people that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately, not tagged or moved to the talk page.
===Pretendimet e veçanta kërkojnë burime e veçanta===
{{detaje|Wikipedia:Fringe theories}}
Any exceptional claim requires ''multiple'' high-quality sources.<ref>[[David Hume|Hume, David]]. [http://books.google.com/books?id=H1rKYw9SnTgC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA86 ''An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding''], Forgotten Books, 1984, pp. 82, 86; first published in 1748 as ''Philosophical enquiries concerning human Understanding'', (or the Oxford 1894 edition {{OL|7067396M}} at para. 91) "A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence. ... That no testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous, than the fact, which it endeavours to establish; and even in that case there is a mutual destruction of arguments, and the superior only gives us an assurance suitable to that degree of force, which remains, after deducting the inferior." In the 18th century, [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]] reformulated the idea as "The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness." [[Marcello Truzzi]] recast it again, in 1978, as "An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof." [[Carl Sagan]], finally, popularized the concept broadly as "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" in 1980 on ''[[Cosmos (TV series)|Cosmos]]''; this was the formulation originally used on Wikipedia.</ref>
[[Red flag (signal)|Red flag]]s that should prompt extra caution include:
* surprising or apparently important claims not covered by multiple mainstream sources;
* challenged claims that are supported purely by [[WP:Primary|primary]] or self-published sources or those with an apparent conflict of interest;<ref name="COI SOURCES"/>
* reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character, or against an interest they had previously defended;
* claims that are contradicted by the prevailing view within the relevant community, or that would significantly alter mainstream assumptions, especially in science, medicine, history, politics, and biographies of living people. This is especially true when proponents say there is a [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy]] to silence them.
==Verifikueshmëria dhe parimet e tjera==
{{Përkthe}}
===E drejta e autorit dhe plagjiatura===
{{main|Wikipedia:Copyright|Wikipedia:Plagiarism|Wikipedia:MOS#Attribution|Wikipedia:CITE#In-text attribution}}
Do not plagiarize or breach copyright when using sources. Summarize source material in your own words as much as possible; when quoting or closely paraphrasing a source use an [[WP:INCITE|inline citation]], and [[WP:INTEXT|in-text attribution]] where appropriate.
Do not link to any source that violates the copyrights of others per [[Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking to copyrighted works|contributors' rights and obligations]]. You can link to websites that display copyrighted works as long as the website has licensed the work, or uses the work in a way compliant with fair use. Knowingly directing others to material that violates copyright may be considered [[contributory copyright infringement]]. If there is reason to think a source violates copyright, do not cite it. ''This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as [[YouTube]], where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates copyright.''
===Neutraliteti===
{{detaje|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view}}
Even when information is cited to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], you must present it with a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] (NPOV). All articles must adhere to NPOV, fairly representing all majority and significant-minority viewpoints published by reliable sources, in [[WP:UNDUE|rough proportion]] to the prominence of each view. Tiny-minority views need not be included, except in articles devoted to them. If there is disagreement between sources, use [[WP:INTEXT|in-text attribution]]: "John Smith argues that X, while Paul Jones maintains that Y," followed by an [[WP:INCITE|inline citation]]. Sources themselves do not need to maintain a neutral point of view. Indeed, many reliable sources are ''not'' neutral. Our job as editors is simply to summarize what the reliable sources say.
===Notability===
{{detaje|Wikipedia:Notability}}
If no reliable [[Wikipedia:Third-party sources|third-party sources]] can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.
===Hulumtimi vetiak===
{{detaje|Wikipedia:No original research}}
The "No original research" policy (NOR) is closely related to the Verifiability policy. Among its requirements are:
#All material in Wikipedia articles must be ''attributable'' to a reliable published source. This means that a source must exist for it, whether or not it is cited in the article.
#Sources must support the material clearly and directly: [[WP:SYN|drawing inferences from multiple sources to advance a novel position]] is prohibited by the NOR policy.<ref name=Courtesy>When there is dispute about whether a piece of text is fully supported by a given source, direct quotes and other relevant details from the source should be provided to other editors as a courtesy. Do not violate the source's copyright when doing so.</ref>
#Base articles largely on reliable [[secondary sources]]. While [[primary sources]] are appropriate in some cases, relying on them can be problematic. For more information, see the [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources]] section of the NOR policy, and the [[Wikipedia:BLP#Misuse_of_primary_sources|Misuse of primary sources]] section of the BLP policy.
==Shënime==
{{reflist|2}}
{{Udhëzimet dhe politikat e Wikipedias}}
| |||