Wikipedia:Vërtetueshmëria: Dallime mes rishikimesh

Content deleted Content added
Rreshti 53:
 
===Burime të vetë-publikuara===
Çdokush mund të krijojë një faqe interneti personale ose të publikojë librin e vet dhe gjithashtu të pretendojë të jetë një ekspert në një fushë të caktuar. Për këtë arsye, mediat e vetë-publikuara, si librat, patentat, gazetat, faqet personale të internetit, blogjet personale ose grupore (që dallohen nga lajmet e besueshme si më sipër), postimet e forumeve në internet dhe tweets, nuk janë të pranueshme si burime. Burimet e ekspertëve të vetë-publikuara mund të konsiderohen të besueshme kur prodhohen nga një ekspert i caktuar për lëndën, puna e të cilit në fushën relevante është botuar më parë nga botimet e besueshme të palëve të treta. Përdorini me kujdes kur përdorni burime të tilla: nëse informacioni në fjalë me të vërtetë ia vlen të raportohet, dikush tjetër ndoshta do ta ketë bërë këtë. Asnjëherë mos përdorni burime të vetë-publikuara si burime të palës së tretë për njerëzit që jetojnë, edhe nëse autori është një ekspert dhe hulumtues i mirënjohur profesional ose shkrimtar.
<!-- Be aware when editing the section title, that there is a policy shortcut to this.-->
<!-- This Anchor tag serves to provide a permanent target for incoming section links. Please do not move it out of the section heading, even though it disrupts edit summary generation (you can manually fix the edit summary before saving your changes). Please do not modify it, even if you modify the section title. It is always best to anchor an old section header that has been changed so that links to it won't be broken. See [[Template:Anchor]] for details. (This text: [[Template:Anchor comment]]) -->
 
{{detaje|Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Avoid self-published sources|Wikipedia:List of self-publishing companies}}
Anyone can create a [[personal web page]] or [[self-publishing|publish their own book]], and also [[WP:Expert editors|claim to be an expert]] in a certain field. For that reason, self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs (as distinguished from [[#Newspaper and magazine blogs|newsblogs]], above), Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources. Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work '''in the relevant field''' has previously been published by reliable third-party publications.<ref name="EXCEPTIONAL"/> Exercise caution when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else will probably have done so.<ref>Self-published material is characterized by the ''lack of independent reviewers'' (those without a conflict of interest) validating the reliability of contents. Further examples of self-published sources include press releases, material contained within company websites, advertising campaigns, material published in media by the owner(s)/publisher(s) of the media group, self-released music albums and [[manifesto|electoral manifestos]]:
* The [http://library.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html University of California, Berkeley library] states: "Most pages found in general search engines for the web are self-published or published by businesses small and large with motives to get you to buy something or believe a point of view. Even within university and library web sites, there can be many pages that the institution does not try to oversee."
* [http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pub/integrity/pages/other/ Princeton University] offers this understanding in its publication, ''Academic Integrity at Princeton (2011)'': "Unlike most books and journal articles, which undergo strict editorial review before publication, much of the information on the Web is self-published. To be sure, there are many websites in which you can have confidence: mainstream newspapers, refereed electronic journals, and university, library, and government collections of data. But for vast amounts of Web-based information, no impartial reviewers have evaluated the accuracy or fairness of such material before it's made instantly available across the globe."
* The [http://library.stkate.edu/pdf/citeChicago.pdf Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition] states, "any Internet site that does not have a specific publisher or sponsoring body should be treated as unpublished or self-published work."</ref>
'''Never''' use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.
 
===Burime të vetë-publikuar ose të diskutueshme si burime në vetvete===