Wikipedia:Burime të besueshme: Dallime mes rishikimesh
Content deleted Content added
Βατο (diskuto | kontribute) v + |
v →News organizations: Rregullim i gabimeve me referimet., zëvendësova: |language=English → |language=En (2) duke përdorur AWB |
||
Rreshti 32:
News sources often contain both reporting content and editorial content. Mainstream ''news reporting'' is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact, though even the most reputable reporting sometimes contains errors. [[WP:Primary|''Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion'']] pieces are reliable for attributed statements as to the opinion of the author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact.
* When taking information from [[wp:primary|opinion pieces]], the identity of the author may help determine reliability. The opinions of specialists and recognized experts are more likely to be reliable and to reflect a significant viewpoint.<ref>Please keep in mind that any exceptional claim would require [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Exceptional claims require_exceptional_sources|exceptional secondary sources]], and this is policy.</ref> If the statement is not authoritative, attribute the opinion to the author in the text of the article and do not represent it as fact. Book reviews too can be opinion, summary or scholarly pieces.<ref name="Princeton">{{Cite web|url=http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=book%20review|title=Book reviews|accessdate=September 22, 2011|publisher=Princeton|year=© 2011|author=Princeton|work=Scholarly definition document|format=html|language=
* For information about academic topics, scholarly sources and high-quality non-scholarly sources are generally better than news reports. News reports may be acceptable depending on the context. Articles which deal in depth with specific studies, as a specialized article on science, are apt to be of more value than general articles which only tangentially deal with a topic. Frequently, although not always, such articles are written by specialist writers who may be cited by name.
* While the reporting of rumors has a limited news value, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should include information ''verified'' by reliable sources. [[WP:NOTGOSSIP|Wikipedia is not the place]] for passing along gossip and rumors.
| |||