Wikipedia:Pikëpamje neutrale: Dallime mes rishikimesh

"Writing for the enemy" might make it seem as if we were adding ''deliberately'' flawed arguments to Wikipedia, which would be a very strange thing to do. But it's better to view this (otherwise puzzling) behavior as adding the ''best'' (published) arguments of the opposition, preferably citing some prominent person who has actually made the argument in the form in which you present it, stating them as sympathetically as possible. Academics, e.g., philosophers, do this all the time.

 

 

It might help to consider an example of a biased text and how Wikipedians have rendered it at least relatively unbiased.